Once again you assume nothing changes. Sorry you miss the point. Some places are unfarmable using current technology and available resources and shouldn't be. These same lands were givin out as farm lands which was incomparably more stupid. It's really stupid to build a large city in the middle of a desert, that doesn't mean there isn't sufficient water elsewhere. It's really stupid to grow large amounts of cattle where there is no water, but the government facilitates it, until it doesn't. That doesn't change the basic facts. I already stated in this thread that clean water was the major limiting factor, bad planning usually by governments makes that matter worse. But, it seems you like to throw out nonsense factoids of your own.
William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "P. J. Alling" > Subject: Re: Global warming was: The Nine-spotted > > > >> Another fallacy, you don't have to believe it if you don't want to, but >> the reason why Julian L. Simon won his bet with Paul Ehrlich is the same >> reason we'll not run out of resources. You can read about it here if >> you want to. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehrlich-Simon_bet In fact >> one one of the important Metals expected to be in short supply by the >> end of the last 20th century is now considered an abundant toxic waste, >> can you guess which one? (It wasn't part of this bet). Sustainability >> assumes no change and everything always changes. >> > > Maybe you should talk to some ranchers in your own Southwest about how much > water resource they have. > You come up with nonsense factoids to cloud the issues you are afraid to > face. > Carry on then. > I'm done with you. > > William Robb > > > -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
