Yeah, my *ist D still does the job I got it for when it came out. No reason to spend more $$ to upgrade. Plus, I still use my classic Pentax silver ESII and my PZ-1p 35mm cameras. No need for SD cards on those cameras.
On Jun 16, 2007, at 11:59 AM, John Francis wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 08:59:15AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I opted to stick with my *ist D because I had a few CF cards. I >> didn't >> want to have to spend more money to get SD cards to use on a newer >> Pentax. > > Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. A 2GB 150x card in now, what, $20? > Saving that kind of money is definitely a reason to forego any > possible > improvements in camera technology. Especially since the only > plausible > step-up from a *ist-D at present is the K10D, which is going to set > you > back $800 or so. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
