The CF cards are sturdier overall. Yes, there can be pin alignment problems, but the cards themselves are much less fragile. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why? I see no great advantage to CF over SD. > > I've had equipment that used both of these card types for a long > time. I find the SD format easier to manage because they're smaller, > but there's nothing much in either direction to choose between them. d > > Godfrey > > > On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:26 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > But Sandisk Ultra II are much slower than the Transcend 150X. You > > have to go to the Sandisk Extreme III to top or match the Transcend > > for speed. I use both Transcend and Sandisk now. I had a Transcend > > that simply failed right off the shelf. But I had a Sandisk that > > broke apart when the little plastic bits that separate the contacts > > started to fall apart. Both could be better. Give me back by CF cards! > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
