Yes, that may be true, but do not lie to employees as to the reason the photos are being blocked..Joe P.S. She received a different computer that week, so maybe the person before her that used the computer was a porn viewer..
At 03:51 PM 6/23/07, you wrote: >No it satisfies, employers who don't want their employees looking at >porn when they're supposed to be working. That's what those filters are >meant for, (plus a scary message that your attempt to access a forbidden >site has been logged). Personally I see no problem using it this way, >you get paid at work to do things you wouldn't do otherwise, that's why >it's called work. > >John Sessoms wrote: > >> From: > >> J > >> > >> Listen to this..Where my wife works, she was going to the page were my > >> photos are on photo.net www.photo.net/photos/pjjdxn and she received > >> a ERROR which said: The following error was encountered, > >> Access denied by Smartfilter: Forbidden, this page > >> www.photo.net/photos/pjjdxn is categorized as: Nudity > >> > >> AS you have seen before on the page there is no nudity at all on the > >> page, but yes their are nude photos are other people's pages, so I > >> guess they just decide to block it all............Joe > >> > > FWIW, the American Cancer Society is categorized the same way by > > "smartfilter", because they have "breasts". > > > > Not very smart at all, but it satisfies the religio-fascists who want to > > keep you barefoot and pregnant. > > > > > > > > >-- >All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
