Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

>Ann,
>
>I don't use Photo.net for the purposes of presenting my photographs  
>for reasons like this. I hate having other people's advertising and  
>on my pages and find their service restrictions obnoxious. It is so  
>easy to get your own domain and put up your own web page, and so  
>inexpensive today, that I see no point to it.
>
>G
>  
>
Ive done that, of course....  on Smugmug --
Though it isn't exactly right yet.

The point is when I joined photo.net I paid for my megs and there were 
no ads --
they snuck in the ad stuff fairly recently - without telling us. sigh.

ann



>
>On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:30 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Guys - I just saw on Dave's page and my own one reason I've gone  
>>over to
>>Smugmug (although keeping the photo.net galleryes)
>>They now have advertising at the bottom of the page - rather larger  
>>ads...
>>
>>I'm paying for my space -  so I called them ad guy and vented ...
>>
>>He is telling me they are changing stuff on the site, and they want to
>>hear feedback, etc...
>>
>>So I'm writing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  to gripe
>>
>>It was bad enough when the photo.net mascot thumbnail was at the  
>>bottom
>>of my pages and someone looking
>>at my stuff thought the dog pics were mine as it was clickable.
>>
>>I talked to the guy who as in charge of advertising and he was  
>>actually
>>pretty pleasant -
>>
>>So if you are on photo.net lets bombard Josh with gripes  I don't want
>>to leave the site totally...
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to