Thanks, Pete.  Based on what I've read the SP1000 and SP500 really 
aren't all that different functionally.  I did mis-read the flash sync 
chart for the SP500.  Both the 500 and 1000 manuals suggest maximum X 
sync at 1/8 for M class bulbs and 1/15 for F class.  It's interesting 
that you were able to get good exposures at 1/30.

P. J. Alling wrote:
> My experience with flashbulbs and SLRs was with the SP1000.  I used it 
> at x  1/30sec.  I did a bit of experimenting using FP sync., (m class 
> bulbs not FP), but that turned out badly.  Prior to that I used flash 
> bulbs with leaf shutter folders and box type cameras, a more or less 
> flash and hope system.  Even 35 years ago flash bulbs were relatively 
> expensive.  I figured out that an electronic flash at $45.00 would save 
> me a ton of money in the long run so I bought one.
>
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>   
>> Lately, I've had an opportunity to look at some Kodachrome exposed with 
>> M2B blue flash bulbs.  The character of the light is certainly different 
>> than that of electronic flash.  A couple dozen of these could be in my 
>> very near future. 
>>
>> And now, of course, my dilemma.  I'm hoping that a few of you have some 
>> experience with flash bulbs and can shed some, er, light on the 
>> situation.  The chart here http://www.flashbulbs.com/bluebulb.htm 
>> suggests that these bulbs will X sync to 1/30.  The manuals for the MX 
>> and SP500 recommend 1/15 at the fastest, while the K1000 manual 
>> recommends 1/30.  This seems a bit odd to me.  As this sort of 
>> photography is relatively expensive, I'd rather not experiment too 
>> much.  (Kodachrome + processing + bulbs at $1per that may not fire)
>>
>> Does anyone recall how they may have used these bulbs?  I'm guessing 
>> that I'd be safe at 1/15, but if I can squeeze out 1/30 I'd be happy.
>>
>> Thanks a bunch, folks!
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to