Thanks Jostein, No I didn't delete it. No idea why I like it (maybe for the reasons you mentioned) and maybe because I didn't compose it or planned it. The consensus seems to be to delete it, Pentax gallery declined it in a record time and now I'm sure: it's printing big and going on the wall.
On 8/8/07, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Toine, > > Chiming in very late. Hope you haven't deleted it yet. :-) > > I think it's a keeper for many reasons. It has a decent composition > with the triangle between the sharp horizontal line and the escaping > bug. It is immediately obvious what is going on, and still it is a bit > abstract. The distinction between OOF and motion blur is notable, but > they work together because of the good sharpness on the in-focus line. > > It has very pleasant colours, and the OOF areas are soft and nice too. > > cheers, > Jostein > > 2007/7/28, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > For this peso I really need your advice (thumbs up or down) > > > > http://leende.net/peso/20070728 > > > > A total surprise. Normally I delete blurred shots but this one looks > > like a keeper. > > > > -- > > Toine > > http://leende.net > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ > http://alunfoto.blogspot.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Toine http://leende.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
