On 8/14/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kenneth Waller" > Subject: Re: 300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax > > > > FWIW - > > > > I have the FA 300mm f4.5, Its a wonderful lens even if it doesn't have a > > tripod mount. > > > > Unless you absolutely, positively need the extra light a 2.8 aperture > > provides, I find it very hard to justify the extra cost of the 2.8 300mm > > over the 4.5 300mm. > > Which 300/4.5 do I have? It must be the F. Mine has a tripod mount, and is > wonderfully small, smaller than my FA200/4 macro.
I have the FA version: <http://picasaweb.google.com/OzSavage/Misc/photo?authkey=TrIZRqTedfw#5096341721848299026> It's the one on the left. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
