Yeah, and small sensors will improve too, just not as much. Small size matters to people and the small sensors are here to stay. It just shifts more of the market away from the MF or bigger formats. I'm not saying these things won't exist, but they will be even more of a niche market ( and even more expensive) that their corresponding film formats were.
I'm not against anything. I have no doubt they produce wonderful results. What's that got to do with business? >>> John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/14/2007 10:55 PM >>> From: "Steve Desjardins" > Film size and sensor size are two different things. Grain vs. > resolution and all that, and maybe wide angles. However, my argument is > a market one. LF is film and always will be. MF may hang around as a > film format. But how many folks, e.g., wedding photographers, are going > to drop the big money to get an MF sensor when there are cheaper > alternatives that give good results. The one exception would be if for > some reason a miraculous breakthrough made sensors very inexpensive. Over the long haul it won't take a miraculous breakthrough. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net !SIG:46c26c08168491306186187! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
