On 22/08/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've heard that said before, but what kind of tolerances are we talking > about? I would think that's it's not as expensive as it may seem, but is > used as a value-added feature to raise the price on the high-end bodies. > > Not arguing with you, but it just seems to me that everthing has to be > manufactured to pretty close tolerances already. A slop of 1 - 5% in other > body parts would mean the thing wouldn't fit together.
It sounds like a well worn argument to me too these days, it may have been entirely true in the days of the Nikon F. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net