Except that the KX isn't an *ist or an MZ-S, which were the parameters of the original post.
Not that that's stopped anyone else...... :-)> Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney, Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters Quoting Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Once I receive my KX, I will be better equipped to respond to this > > interesting discussion... > > Glen > > On Aug 27, 2007, at 4:30 PM, William Robb wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tom C" > > Subject: Re: Film slrs > > > > > >> I'd go with the MX as well. > >> > >> I loved my PZ-1p for all it was feature wise, and IMO it had > >> really good > >> metering. > >> > >> I never owned an LX, but I was frankly afraid to because of the > >> repair/service frequency I saw anecdotally on the list. > >> > > > > My LX's were quite problematic, although the most recent service > > > and the > > upgrades that were done at that time seems to have cleared things > > > up nicely > > on them. I was told at the time that I didn't use them enough, > and > > that most > > LX problems were caused them sitting dormant. > > My little black MX is quite nice as well. > > > > William Robb > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally - A spam blocker that actually works. http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/4 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
