Dave, I'll bring mine & lenses. I didn't this year. Regards, Bob S. On 8/31/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark. > I'm very happy with my 90 LS that came with my camera. Bought mine, > used from lister Chris Brogden in 2001 or 2002. Payed $1000 Can for > the body and lens. That was a deal at the time.LOL > > Looks like a good brotherhood turn out for next years GFM, eh,. > > Dave > > On 8/30/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The 67 I've bought is coming without a lens and I'l looking for > > recommendations about a choice of normal lens. I seem to recall that > > the 105/2.4 is better regarded than the 90/2.8, but I think I'd still > > prefer the shorter focal length, personally. An alternative I'd > > consider would be a 75mm f/4.5, although it's a bit slow for a normal > > lens. Any comments on any of this? Other suggestions? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > Equine Photography > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > Ontario Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
