That's fine if that's what you want to do. It does not contradict what I said, however.
BTW: unless you're using a Nikon 9000 or Imacon scanner, or drum scanner, or do all the processing with a high quality wet lab enlarger and chemical printing process, the 645 negatives will only just match the image quality available from a K10D exposure for up to a 16x20 inch print. I've tested this and found it to be true to my satisfaction. Godfrey On Sep 6, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Adam Maas wrote: > I'm not much of a tripod user with 35mm/digital stuff. But I don't use > that kit for the most part if max quality is the goal, I pull out the > 645 and the tripod and shoot with MLU and a remote release. > > -Adam > > > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> Without using a tripod, you're cutting your maximum resolution by a >> factor of at least 50%. Even at 1/500 second exposure time. >> >> This is not be important for many types of photographs, but for >> others it is a very important factor. I use a tripod a LOT of the >> time. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
