P. J. Alling wrote:
> I'd be interested in the A50 1.7 but you could probably get a lot more 
> for it on e-Bay than I'm willing or able to pay...
>   
So, you reckon one of those unbelievable sums may also be reached for an 
A lens, too? I have a good mind to try, now.
> Toralf Lund wrote:
>   
>> I'm thinking about selling some Pentax equipment that I don't use much. 
>> Not sure I'll actually be able to part with it, but I will at least 
>> mention it here and see if there's any interest at all. The items are...
>>
>>    1. FA 100-300/4.7-5.8
>>    2. M150/3.5
>>    3. A50/1.7 or M50/1.7, if anyone will consider paying anything at all
>>       for another 50...
>>    4. Takumar-A 2X teleconverter.
>>
>> I haven't really decided on prices yet, so if you're interested, just 
>> make an offer.
>>
>> Everyone knows how nice all of this is, right? So I don't have to 
>> describe any of it?
>>
>> Besides perhaps the 100-300 - I think I should point out that this is 
>> not that horrible "power zoom" thing, but a newer design that's also 
>> "consumer grade", but still much better than the older variant.
>>
>> - Toralf
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to