On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:18:46PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote: > David Savage wrote: > > >Actually the 80-200 could do with a service. > > > >The zoom ring is a little loser than is normal for a PZ lens. > > Same with mine. But it's been that way for 6 or so years and hasn't > gotten any worse. Yet. > > (And talk about a lens that costs more than most 67 kit. Worth every > penny!)
I agree - just being without it for a few weeks is noticeable. It's the lens that has produce more of my good shots than any of the others, although the two lenses I own that were more expensive (the A* 300/2.8 and the monster 250-600) have each produced their share. If you can afford it, money spent on lenses is well spent. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
