Well, congratulations, though it is a Tamron, and not a Pentax... Tim Øsleby wrote: > My K-500/4,5 is a very good lens, within its limitations. It has been a > faithful companion. > Usually I'm faithful too. But no rule without exception. So > http://preview.tinyurl.com/25y5r6 I think US $747.00 is a good catch. > It is a bit shorter, but should also be a lot easyer to handle. The > K-500/4,5 is a lot of lens :-) > Judging from the information I have found, it is a lot better at wide > apertures. This should allow me to shoot at f:4,5. > I have high hopes that a cropped image from this, will give better resultion > and contrast, than from an uncropped image from the 500/4,5 Specially when > shooting with large apertures. Comments? > > I can also see a Tammy SP 180/2,5 in my horizon. Wonder how that lens works > with an extender or three, as a semi macro. Anybody tried it? > > Tim Typo > Mostly Harmless > > >
-- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
