A lot of the pictures on there seem like crisp snapshots of pretty things rather than good photographs. Anyone can take a well focused picture of something pretty, but is it really worthy? I don't know. Perhaps we're just back to the "art" discussion.
rg2 On 9/13/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to the Camera Club, Frank. If your photos don't look like everyone > else's photos you do not know how to take pictures... > > > frank theriault wrote: > > To those who've complained that not all of your photos have been > > accepted in the Pentax Gallery, quit yer bitchin'! > > > > Not one of mine has been accepted so far. > > > > Not a single one. > > > > I've still got about 6 pending, but 6 have been rejected outright. > > Street shots, still lifes, sports shots (Corner Kick, fer gawd's sake > > - and if I'm allowed a moment of immodesty, that was a muther of a > > photo!), portraits. None of it "good enough". > > > > I no longer hold great hope for my participation in this venture. > > > > I kind of feel like not submitting any more. If the 6 that I have > > pending are rejected, I guess I'll know that I don't measure up to > > their standards (whatever they may be), and find another place to show > > my piccies... > > > > cheers, > > frank > > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- "the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition" -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
