> They may have used it solely for its commercial applications...editor's > suggestion.(?)
I personally know three that stated it was their choice (even tho two were sponsored by Fuji). They could have submitted images on any film they chose. I also think, to be competitive with their competition, they chose Velvia. Kenneth Waller http://tinyurl.com/272u2f ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: A few more images.... > They may have used it solely for its commercial applications...editor's > suggestion.(?) > > Jack > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A follow up email, which you haven't seen, corrected my DUH moment - >> >> It should have read - >> Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known >> outdoor >> photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to Digital.. >> >> >> Kenneth Waller >> http://tinyurl.com/272u2f >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Sessoms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: A few more images.... >> >> >> > From: >> > "Kenneth Waller" >> >>> .....Velvia may give some images that little boost that makes >> them >> >>> appear closer to our memory of >the scene. >> >> >> >> Probably why most (if not all) of the current nationally known >> outdoor >> >> photographers shot Velvia for years before switching to Velvia. >> > >> > ???????? >> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user > panel and lay it on us. > http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
