>The viewer in question is written in Flash ;-)

somehow right after I clicked send I had the thought that you would
say that. ;) the pictures are nice, by the way.  I like the mossy rock
the most, it looks like a gerat place to sit and enjoy lunch.

rg2

On 9/19/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently poorly...
>
> Adam Maas wrote:
> > Rebekah,
> >
> > The viewer in question is written in Flash ;-)
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> >
> > Rebekah wrote:
> >
> >> use flash.  it seems to be so popular ;)
> >>
> >> rg2
> >>
> >> On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Adam,
> >>> I missed this post earlier. I tried looking at the gallery using Firefox 
> >>> on a Mac at work. Only the first image was visible. The others all 
> >>> appeared about 80% out of frame.
> >>> Paul
> >>>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> >>> From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>> Rick,
> >>>>
> >>>> What don't you like about the viewer? And do you have anything to 
> >>>> recommend
> >>>> instead? I've generally been impressed by Autoviewer, it's lightweight 
> >>>> for a
> >>>> flash viewer and doesn't intrude much (The slowness is more a case of my 
> >>>> poor
> >>>> upload bandwidth than the viewer itself)
> >>>>
> >>>> -Adam
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Rick Womer wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Adam,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The pics are nice (I especially like the last one),
> >>>>> but the viewer is awful.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rick
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've put together a gallery of my landscapish work
> >>>>>> from Sudbury, ON.
> >>>>>> It's mostly MF stuff, but some 35mm and some
> >>>>>> digital. All shots have
> >>>>>> been taken within 5 minutes drive of the downtown
> >>>>>> core except for the
> >>>>>> creek and the billboard, which were both shot in the
> >>>>>> New Sudbury
> >>>>>> commercial area. Sudbury's an interesting city, one
> >>>>>> of the few cities of
> >>>>>> 160,000 where you can walk from the downtown core to
> >>>>>> utter wilderness in
> >>>>>> a reasonable time, and drive there in 5 minutes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://www.mawz.ca/sets/sudbury/index.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Adam
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>>>> PDML@pdml.net
> >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> ________________________________________________________________________________
> >>>> ____
> >>>>
> >>>>> Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get 
> >>>>> listings,
> >>>>>
> >>>> and more!
> >>>>
> >>>>> http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> PDML@pdml.net
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> PDML@pdml.net
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Remember, it's pillage then burn.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
"the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition"

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to