Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > You might hunt for a Pentax 16/3.5 ... I don't buy Sigma lenses and > the difference between a 17 and an 18 isn't worth the expense IMO. A > better lens might be worth it, however. > > However, I suspect the Pentax DA14/2.8 or DA12-24/4 are better > performers on the DSLR (Cotty's FrankenCanonPentax 16mm > notwithstanding... ;-). > > G > > >
I can vouch for the Tamron 14mm/2.8 SP. Weighty fella, but sharp as a tack and full-frame too. KEH had a little splurg of LN samples a few months back and I got one at a good price. D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
