Your point only makes full sense if Pentax never produces a FF DSLR body, if they do then the lenses with extra coverage (FF) would be better if marked as such rather than the somewhat vague DA designations. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Margus Männik Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 5:39 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: DA70 and 24x36 coverage Right. PRIMARY feature and function of DA lenses (incuding DA40 and DA70) is an optimal performance with digital bodies. Everything else doesn't matter. BRM J. C. O'Connell wrote: > series designations give indication to features and functions. if they > arent the same, then there should be different designations > IMHO.....COVERAGE should be considered as a function of those lenses, > not a undocumented bonus you have to remember because the desigination > is vague. jco > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
