> > > My analogy was not about price, it was about image, prestige, perception > > in > > the market place. Sure a FF DSLR will cost more than one with an APS-C > > size > > sensor. If the Canons, Nikon's, Sony's of the world offer FF DSLR's, >then > > Pentax must also. If they do not, they will relegate themselves to a >2nd > > tier camera company, and it doesn't matter who loves their camera, or >how > > much it satisfies their current needs. > >Unfortunately, they probably thiink they have history on their side. How >many generations behind the curve they were with film cameras? Four? Five? >I >know the film SLR line was a bad joke from the late 1980s onwards. >But somehow, they managed to soldier onwards. >If they think they can pull it off again, bully for them, but it would be >nice if they at least tried this time. > >William Robb >
Agreed, while I loved my PZ-1p, that was 10 years ago. I'm 2 years smarter since then. :-) I realize I was bargain shopping and it seemed like a good deal, and it was. For me the PZ-1p was a big step up from an MX. Now though, I realize I was shooting low. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
