According to one photographer I have been friends with for many years, one of his corporate clients has ordered four digit figures of Olympus E-3 cameras, to replace the E-1 and E-300s they currently have, for their commercial photography staffers, who number in the several hundreds of people. It's anecdotal information, but I'd call that "a lot".
As I said, Nikon and Canon are the most highly visible part of the community. They're in sports, photojournalism, news, and a lot of other highly visible markets, they have large number of name photographers. But that doesn't mean there aren't a lot of other photographers out there. Godfrey On Oct 17, 2007, at 8:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What's "a lot?" At any venue that attracts pro photographers you'd > be lucky to find one Olympus shooter out of a hundred. Seems to be > about the same penetration as Pentax. > Paul > >> A photographer I am corresponding with belongs to the Olympus >> professional services program. The benefits are very good, and you >> discover that there is a community of a lot of pros using Olympus >> equipment. >> >> Nikon and Canon "own" the above water part of the iceberg which is >> professional photography through their highly visible marketing >> efforts. But the iceberg is 80% or more under water. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.