> > Can anything be done to convince whoever maintains the server > > to do a better job? My ability to participate has essentially > > been nil over recent weeks.
Gimme a break... > Whatever problems going on at mail-archive.com have absolutely > nothing to do with the PDML server. The PDML server is fine. > There is nothing wrong with the PDML server. One more time: The > PDML server is healthy and happy. Thanks for trying to making that clear, Doug. > I spend a lot of time and not a little money keeping the PDML > server fed and happy and it is running very smoothly right now, > and I am beginning to resent that any time a service over which > I have no control gets, in some people's opinion, behind in its > VOLUNTARY service, I get the blame. As one of my friends often said, "No good deed ever goes unpunished" - <g>. > Both the PDML and the separate organization that handles our > archiving are brought to you by people who feel that both are > worthwhile. They are both brought to you at no charge. If you > have problems with either service that are insurmountable, there > is only one course of action. Demand your money back. Good advice, Doug. So, let's stop the whining and be a little more appreciative, eh? Fred - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
