That's one of the newer 'Takumar(Bayonet)' lenses. IMHO it's quite sharp but flares easily. Had my mitts on one for a couple weeks (loaner from a friend with GAS) and was favourably impressed. Will probably look for an M42 Super or SMC Tak version instead though.
-Adam Steve Desjardins wrote: > You're forgetting the most infamous one of all. The Takumar 135 F2.5. > We used to have regular arguments on the list about whether or not it > was worth spending even $25 on one. I had one but gave it away. ;-) > >>>> ".timber>>code" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2007 11:31 AM >>> > Is there any real, visible differenc between the multi coated > SMC-Takumars and the normal (older) Takumar? Could anyone show the > difference between non coated, single coated and multicoated lens? > > Thanks, > ..t > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
