Haven't I answered this before? The huge reason is that majordomo does not have this capacity. Since it doesn't, someone would have to build a hack. That someone would have to be someone other than me, because A.) I have no time and B.) I have no interest in spending the time to build a redundancy into the digest subject list and, of course, C.) I'd have to teach myself perl scripting before I could even begin to attack something as relatively temperamental as the majordomo digesting procedure. Which brings us back to A.
I could see the need for an index on the digest, and I worked hard to get it done. Frankly, I don't see numbers as any sort of improvement; it's no harder to search for a word string than it is to search for a number string. However, if someone else wants to build it, test it and explain to me how to install it, I'll see what I can do. Doug At 7:43 AM -050011/15/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, or at least typed: >Several times I've written and asked why this site cannot use a numbered >index. It is easier to look at a numbered index and then find a numbered >entry. It is easier then attempting to read similiar entries from a long >list, unnumbered. > >Thank you, >Burt >NYC >USA -- Douglas Forrest Brewer Ashwood Lake Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alphoto.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
