No, they do have a 'pretty good, but not a must-buy option'. In fact the L10 got this (Recommended) instead of the coveted 'Highly Recommended' conclusion.
-Adam On 12/17/07, Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, David J Brooks wrote: > > > On Dec 15, 2007 2:25 PM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Boris, I really think some reviews (rare ones) are truely useful, > >> complete and objective as one can be. > >> However DpReview (notthe onl site of course but it is very good > >> example) typically proves the guys running it are either incompetent > >> (which I beleive) are a lot more interested in the revenues the site > >> generates (also the case for DpR). > > > > I decided their "reviews" are useless as reviews a long time ago. > They're good at enumerating and comparing published specifications between > different brands/models, but that's about it. Their choices on test shots > are rather poor (JPEG? Kit lens?), although this recent one appears to > use a good prime and RAW. > > According to them, *EVERY* camera they "review" is a must-buy, > great camera. > > -Cory > > -- > > ************************************************************************* > * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * > * Electrical Engineering * > * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * > ************************************************************************* > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
