'Polyhead', (Note that most people here use their real names, not some puffery.) I'm glad that I've missed this thread. Your pictures take to long to load. The extra time doesn't bring any extra quality. You're wasting my time (on a high speed line!) Why should I look? To give you some note of praise? Not after your arrogant rants. Go away and don't bother us until your attitude improves. You waste the bandwith here. (I'd say your pictures suck too, but I can't be bothered waiting to see them.) Regards, Bob S.
On Dec 19, 2007 2:34 PM, Polyhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:46:46 -0500 > graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Actually, a large percentage of the people here on the list are computer > > professionals. They have forgotten more than you have had enough time yet to > > learn. In my experience only those who know little think they know a lot, > > when > > you actually know a lot, you also know how much you do not know and become > > somewhat humble. > > Well, see there is the problem. They make the assumption i've not written > any image decoders. I'm willing to bet I've written at least one more than > most of the people here. Raise your hand if you know M68K assembly. I've > met plenty of people that are "IT Professionals" that don't know their ass > from a whole in the ground. Like the guy telling me switching to flat HTML > would magically increase the speed of the the site. > > > Are you familiar with the term "invincible ignorance"? That is how you are > > coming across here. If that is not how you want to come across, maybe you > > should > > think about it a bit. > > Its more that I just don't give a shit. Really, who am I trying to impress? > I don't care, I've got better things to do with my life than try to please > everybody. Its my website, I'll run it my way, if they dont' like it, they > can kiss my ass. It only exists to give me something to tinker with. > > > > > Graywolf > > Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com > > Blog: http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/ > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Polyhead wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:45:44 -0500 (EST) > > > Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Polyhead wrote: > > >> > > >>> jpeg is lossy compression. > > >> Well, that's true. > > >> > > >>> It grabs a square of pixels and averages them > > >> Oh my. If ignorance were cornflakes... > > > > > > I'm fully aware thats over simplifing it. But discussing the exacts of > > > how it works would be far over the heads of most people here. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >> PDML@pdml.net > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > >> follow the directions. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > -- > Ben 'Polyhead' Smith > KE7GAL > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
