Would something like the 468MG http://tinyurl.com/23m56t qualify.. ?
Rgds Patrick On Jan 8, 2008 2:29 PM, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > With big glass, a ball head is a bad choice. > > I'm gonna disagree. Not with the statement but with the original lens > in question. The 50-500 is not "big glass." For it's focal length it > is very light and small, even when extended, and works very well on a > good (see "large") ball head due to the pretty decent tripod collar. > > With anything like 300/2.8, 400/2.8, 500/4 600/5.6 or 600/4... Now > that's big glass and a gimbal mount is the only choice. > -- > > Christian > http://photography.skofteland.net > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Regards Patrick Genovese -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
