I'm surprised that Pigeon Point wasn't accepted. It's an exceptional
shot.
There have been pano shot on which I've voted "no" because that was
identified in the beginning as reason for them to be declined. I took
that as part of the voting instructions. There were some that were only
slightly pano cropped that I didn't consider severe enough. I'm just
offering this as a possible reason for the second shot being declined.

Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think I am ready to give up.
> 
> These two were finally declined after sitting there waiting for about
> 3 weeks - which means the final judges declined after peer approval.
> 
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/elephantseals_0003a.htm
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0739-07b.htm
> 
> Oh well.
> 
> -- 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
> and follow the directions.
> 




      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to