My subject line was the headline of the article as presented, Paul. I did not intend it to mean anything other than to identify the piece as it was published on MSNBC.com.
Of course, it's a bit sensationalist ... as are most headlines in this horrid infotainment world of marketing pap and spin we live in today. ;-) Godfrey On Feb 26, 2008, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Interesting, as far as it goes. And relevant in regard to > journalism and crime photography. I think your title misleads a > bit. The article speaks of restoring the credibility of a > photograph -- that is, developing a method of determining that a > photo hasn't been altered when that is important. It says nothing > about restoring "photography's credibility." But I suspect that > distinction was inadvertent on your part. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I thought this article published by Anick Jesdanun of the Associated >> Press an interesting read. >> >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23342630/ >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
