Strange, I actually read somewhere that new 40/2 wasn't all that good and that it actually seemed to have lost to 40 ltd by Pentax during some sort of comparison shoot.
I for one stick with my 43 ltd for a small size optic. Boris William Robb wrote: > Years ago, I bought a "collectors set" of porcelain dolls for my wife. > A couple of weeks ago, I bought a 58mm lens from Cameraquest. > Sadly, a 40mm lens was shipped in it's place, and I decided that while one > cannot have too many > lenses, I already have two 40mm lenses, and I should at least try to show a > bit of fiscal > responsibility while living off the avails of the legal profession, so I sent > it back. > However, I am weak, and I tried the lens out anyway. > I just looked at the files today, and am thinking, "this is a heck of a nice > lens". > Sharp, and at the same time, creamy. > Anyone thinking of the Pentax 40mm LTD should do themselves a favour and > think of the 40mm > Voigtlander instead, > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/dolls.html > > Have fun > > William Robb > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
