I wouldn't go to Canon. I might consider Nikon. Canon doesn't have the high ISO performance of either Nikon or Pentax. If starting from scratch, I'd probably have to think it over, but might stay with what I have. Familiarity is a good thing. In-body shake reduction is a big advantage for those of us lean in the pocketbook. And Pentax glass promises to be affordable, if the new 200 and 300 are any indication. On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:05 PM, David Savage wrote: > At 05:57 AM 20/03/2008, Cotty wrote: >> On 19/3/08, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> I will replace the gear. >> >> Hey when the insurance comes through, a good time to upgrade to >> Canon :-D > > > That's not such a silly thing to consider IMO. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
