Thanks Paul.

I just found out that I qualify for an academic license, which is a  
lot cheaper than the regular version, and ordered Photoshop. Now all I  
hope is that I will actually find the time to learn the very basics,  
at least.


Marcus

--
Am 25.03.2008 um 18:39 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Yes, it's a PhotoShop process.  I should have been clear about that.  
> PhotoShop is quite expensive, but it's also very powerful. I'd be  
> lost wihout it. However, I know others do just fine using other  
> software. I'm not sure, but PS Elements, which is much less  
> expensive, may have channel mixer capability. Perhaps someone else  
> can tell us.
> Paul
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Marcus A. Hofmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Paul, I assume you're talking about Adobe Photoshop (which I am
>> hesitating to buy, because I am not sure if I really need such
>> expensive software)?
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>> --
>> Am 13.03.2008 um 15:59 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> Thanks Marcus (and all others who responded).
>>> I use the channel mixer for BW conversions most of the time. After
>>> clicking on "monochromatic," I usually start with about 80% red, 12%
>>> green and 10% blue, then fiddle with the sliders. A bit less of one,
>>> a bit more of another. I just work the numbers until I think it
>>> looks good. I sometimes go to -2 or -4 on the adjustment called
>>> "Constant" as well.
>>>
>>> -------------- Original message ----------------------
>>> From: "Marcus A. Hofmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Paul, that's a very nice shot. Reminds me of a new years eve  
>>>> party a
>>>> while ago, where at 0:00 everyone was busy with their cellphones...
>>>>
>>>> Btw, how do you do your b/w conversions? Looks good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marcus
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Am 13.03.2008 um 11:39 schrieb Paul Stenquist:
>>>>
>>>>> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since  
>>>>> there's
>>>>> no activity here, I'll offer another. Had I to shoot this over
>>>>> again,
>>>>> I'd stop down a wee bit to get the rear figures in focus as well  
>>>>> as
>>>>> the front. But it's a mildly amusing pic as shot. K20D, DA50-200,
>>>>> 50mm, f4, 1/100th, ISO 1600 at the coffee shop:
>>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7050569&size=lg
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>>>>> and follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>>>> and follow
>>>> the directions.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>>> and follow the directions.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
>> and follow
>> the directions.
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to