> anywhere close to infinity

is it possible for anything to be close to infinity? Any philosophers
out there?

Bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 April 2008 16:44
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: help needed for new pentax lens website
> 
> I would think it best to restrict something like this to 
> lenses that can be used without an adapter. It might be 
> worthwhile to include m42 Pentax lenses, but I would draw the 
> line there. BTW, although you can fit a Leica 39mm screwmount 
> lens to a Pentax with adapters, it won't focus anywhere close 
> to infinity. It will be macro only. Not exactly useful.
> Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Well you've set yourself an enduring hobby.  Any m42 lens and the 
> > earlier m37 and c, (video, 8mm(?)), mount), Bessamatic or 
> Kodak Retina 
> > IIIS/Reflex  with the proper adapter, I think there may 
> even be a Leica 
> > S (m39) mount to m42 adapter which opens all of the Leica, 
> and copies 
> > such as Canon, (ah think of using a canon f 0.95 50mm), RF 
> lenses,   not 
> > to forget Pentax 645 and 67 lenses.  Then there's the TX T4 
> Adapall etc. 
> > These are just the adapters I know of.  The scope is 
> daunting and the 
> > number of different lenses is astounding.  
> > 
> > Andreas Pfotenhauer wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > as mentioned in the subject, i need your help :-)
> > >
> > > I'm in the process of building a website that will hold a 
> database with 
> > > all lenses usable on Pentax bodies (with preference for 
> the digital 
> > > ones). I know, there is Bojidar Dimitrov's excellent 
> k-mount web page 
> > > (and some others), but thats not what i have in mind, 
> because "kmp" has 
> > > a pure technical perspective and it is restricted to 
> Pentax lenses, 
> > > while i would like to cover *all* lens producers that are 
> usable on a 
> > > Pentax body, and my project will offer more participation 
> for users, it 
> > > will be possible to rate lenses, add comments, there will 
> be a list of 
> > > external resources (URLs) pointing to lens reviews users 
> can add to, etc 
> > > .. somewhat like a Wiki but mostly with structured data 
> (so for example 
> > > one can easily filter for "ultra wide lenses that offer
automatic 
> > > aperture, have a availability rating greater than 3 and a
overall 
> > > quality rating  greater or equal 4") and a set of 
> permissions with what 
> > > a particular type of user(anonymous, registered 
> user,staff,admin) can do 
> > > or not. i think you get a rough idea.
> > >
> > > Problem is, this is some amount of data i have to collect and to

> > > maintain, thats why the whole thing is database driven 
> which in turn 
> > > means, no html skills will be necessary to add and 
> maintain data, and 
> > > I'm optimistic that I'll find sooner or later someone 
> who's interested 
> > > in helping me.
> > >
> > > Second Problem is, i don't know 99% of these lenses, and 
> thats why i 
> > > come to you guys. Getting functional characteristics of a 
> lens (weight, 
> > > size, focal length, aperture etc) is in most cases no big 
> problem, 
> > > thanks to google, but what i would like to have are 
> descriptions of the 
> > > lens, preferably from someone who had it in his hands and 
> did some 
> > > shots. Pictures of lenses are also very welcome. Of 
> course contributions 
> > > will be attributed and pictures will have a explicit 
> copyright notice, 
> > > with a link to the homepage of the contributor or 
> something similar, 
> > > except the contributor does not want to be mentioned.
> > >
> > > Website itself is still in alpha stage, so there is no 
> layout and only 
> > > some sample data, I'm still adding/removing/changing 
> features, but as 
> > > soon as i enter early beta I'll show you something :-)
> > >
> > > with kind regards from Germany,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > > PS: maybe i should mention that this will *not* be a 
> commercial thing, 
> > > actually i intend to place the whole thing under a 
> Creative Commons 3 
> > > Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License (horrible 
> name ^^), except 
> > > of course for picture contributors that wish to retain 
> their copyrights.
> > >
> > >   
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
> >    -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link 
> directly above and follow 
> > the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
> above and follow the directions.
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to