Op Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:33:53 +0200 schreef Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bingo...or if someone who is "allegedly" an astute critic has given it > a gushing review, a portion of the masses will give it a "me too". I have heard art defined as 'what critics call art'. I didn't bother to remember their definition of 'critic'... -- Ciao, Lucas > Jack > --- Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:53, frank theriault wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Scott Loveless >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Here you go: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrerabelo/70458366 >> > >> > That's the one! >> > >> > Thanks for yet another laugh. >> > >> >> It brings to mind something which I've noticed before, however... >> >> If a photo is by someone who is already a "known artist/photographer" >> >> of some repute, it seems to be judged by different standards than if >> >> it was made by one of the unwashed masses. Or am I full of crap? >> >> -Charles -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
