It looks to me like you may have bumped the tripod while changing lenses. Specifically, the 50-135 is aimed slightly higher than the 16-50. I can see slight differences that I couldn't attribute to a change in lens angle, but it is hard to tell...
(Generally, the 50mm on the 50-135mm looks like it has a slightly larger FOV, but that should be true at the bottom of the picture as well as the top, and it isn't.) stan On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Apr 18, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote: >> try comparing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and fa 50 1.4 field of view. you'll be >> surprised >> > > What difference are you pointing out? I see a variation in what the > 50mm marked setting produces in the case of the 16-50 vs the 50-135: > > 16-50 @ 50mm > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/perspective/content/ > IMGP6297_large.html > > 50-135 @ 50mm > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/perspective/content/ > IMGP6298_large.html > > I no longer have an FA50 to compare against. > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
