Well, badly underexposed images are going to suck for noise. very poor test subject, guaranteed to have noise issues.
I wouldn't consider those images as a good test of the 450D/XSi's noise performance. At worst it's an indictment of its metering. -Adam On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.fotovilag.hu/teszt/canon/Canon-450D/canon450d-iso.htm > > Kinda sucks above ISO 400. > > (the page is in hungarian but the pictures are universal :D) > > Cheers, > .t > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
