Op Wed, 21 May 2008 14:42:54 +0200 schreef Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Lucas Rijnders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Op Tue, 20 May 2008 22:30:52 +0200 schreef Thibouille >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> There is no Auto flash on 330/500. >> >> Pity, I really like that flash. I'm back to a Metz 40MZ3, which isn;t >> bas >> at all, but somehow I preferred the 500. >> >>> and btw 540/360 can work in analog >>> TTL with SuperA, 645, LX :) :) >> >> Aargh! Just what I did not need to know. I would love a good flash >> useable >> on a SuperA, 645 and K10... I would love a better wideangle than the FAJ >> 18-35 as well... > > FA 20-35 covers the better wide-angle, IIRC Godfrey had a line on a > few NOS examples for around $400USD. And both the FGZ flashes do TTL > on all TTL-capable Pentax's. I was actually doubting between the 12-24 and the 16-14. I really liked the ultra wide 18 to 24mm perspective on film. The 16-45 would give me the angle of view of a 24mm lens and a convenient range. The 12-24 would be wider, but more specialised. Choices choices... -- Ciao, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
