> 
> From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2008/07/18 Fri PM 09:42:18 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Subject: Re: PESO - No Political or Religious Comment Intended
> 
> I always deal with Wikipedia in my courses.  It's just plain stupid to
> pretend students won't use it.  I usually look up the topics we are
> covering and we talk about the accuracy of the articles.  It's very
> useful since I can make the important point that you can never
> completely trust ANY single source.

Sensible to look at it first, so you are less likely to receive 473 identical 
copies of students' "own work".
  
> 
> >>> "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/18/2008 5:01 PM >>>
> Sad to say Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica
> 
> http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html?hhTest=1.
> 
> Of course the source is CNet so YMMV.
> 
> Doug Franklin wrote:
> > AlunFoto wrote:
> >   
> >> 2008/7/18 Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>     
> >>> AlunFoto wrote:
> >>>
> >>>       
> >>>> Well just kidding, but there's a huge grayzone between generally
> >>>> agreed-upon facts and opinion-based articles. Just think of the
> >>>> ever-lasting re-interpretation of history...
> >>>>         
> >>> Exactly.  I'll use it to look up mathematical formulae and things
> like
> >>> that, but history, sociology, etc., I'll use a different source.
> >>>       
> >> hmmm...
> >> What kind of source would you prefer for such topics?
> >>     
> >
> > Current and historical academic literature and other first sources by
> 
> > preference.  If I'm in a hurry, a more traditional encyclopedia with
> a 
> > reputation for doing the background validation research on the
> articles 
> > before publishing them, peer-reviewed journals from the field, 
> > well-known and -established monographs, etc.
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word
> alone.
>       --Al Capone.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net 
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> 
> !SIG:4881097a67101332813680!
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to