I say yes to this version over the other... looks more real, which I prefer to surreal. One thing bothers me, though, the tree almost dead center ... I wish it were more in fog like the others.. it is such a strong dark line it keeps pulling my eye to it... where as everythng else is so lovely it kinda gets in the way... in the manner of the telepone pole or tree coming out of the top of someones head does... without fudging too much, making it fainter would improve it ...
ann Paul Stenquist wrote: >I did a new conversion of this shot. Less saturation, warmer light, >less sharpening, and a bit of burning in of the brighter elements. >It's here: > >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7582506&size=lg > >And here's the original "Velveetasized" version: >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7581535&size=lg > >The original is more surreal, which isn't necessarily wrong, but I >think I prefer the more subtle version. What say you? > >Paul > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
