> > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/07/31 Thu PM 02:59:42 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > Subject: Re: GESO: Kimberly > > Thanks for the feedback. I've removed stray hair where I thought it > necessary. A bit doesn't bother me. Same with clothing imperfections. > My favorite is 6870, which happens to have gotten the most votes here > as well. Hair in the face included:-).
The hair and the clothes work well in that one but the facial expression leaves me confused. I know we are talking about stereotypes here (along with the breaking of them...) but, for me, one half of her face is portraying one thing and the other half.....well, I don't know _what_ it's doing. If I was the photographer, I'd be checking my fly. > On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:36 AM, mike wilson wrote: > > > > >> > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: 2008/07/31 Thu AM 11:46:41 GMT > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> > >> Subject: Re: GESO: Kimberly > >> > >> You Brits think alike. That's Cotty's pick as well. I like it, but I > >> think it's three or four for me. > >> Paul > > > > For me, it's the only one that shows her looking as I think you > > both wanted her to look, without any minor nits such as rumpled > > clothing or stray hairs. The rest have one or the other but not > > both. Definitely the best by quite some margin. > > > >> On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:00 AM, mike wilson wrote: > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> Date: 2008/07/30 Wed PM 03:45:56 GMT > >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <PDML@pdml.net> > >>>> Subject: GESO: Kimberly > >>>> > >>>> Some of you may recall that I posted a couple of pics from a model > >>>> shoot a couple of months ago. I've finally finished retouching the > >>>> selects and have posted a small gallery. It would be great to > >>>> get two > >>>> pics from anyone who has the time. I'm trying to decide which two > >>>> will go in my hard copy portfolio. The gallery is here: > >>>> > >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=840855 > >>> > >>> 6981p is the only one for me. > >>> > >>> > >>> ----------------------------------------- > >>> Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > >>> Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> PDML@pdml.net > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >>> and follow the directions. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> PDML@pdml.net > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >> and follow the directions. > >> > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email > > Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > and follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
