The body's actually a fair bit smaller than a DS. The K-m is the smallest DSLR currently announced or available, being the same size or smaller than a Oly E-420 in the two dimensions that matter (depth is controlled by the mounted lens and so the E-420's smaller depth measurement is irrelevant. A K-M with a DA 40 will be almost identical in depth to a E-420 with a 25mm pancake)
I'm pretty impressed with the K-m, which I very vocally wasn't about the K200D. -Adam On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Bertil Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pentax calls it small and kantan, kirei, omoshiroi, tanomoshii, > tanoshii and anshin. Simple, pretty, interesting, reliable, fun and > restful for the mind. Cute adjectives aside, I think you can safely > call it nice, at least in the words of Pentax. > > If I am not all together wrong, it should produce pictures virtually > as good as those from my K10D, if not better, in a body as small and > light as that of my old ist*DS, and that with Shake Reduction thrown > in. Not bad at all, quite nice actually. Cheaply too, which should be > nice to all those who have yet to take the step from the digital > compact. > > My five cents worth ;-) > > Bertil > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
