Oh man that is sooooooo low. Sounds a bit like my mane<g> competion for the shows. I always wondered why i would see new faces shooting after 1-2 shows. Found out Saturday, he bounces the cheques, and they obviously don't come back.
Thats loooooooow to. Dave On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't know how accurate this is, but I have heard about a photog that > would give his clients the means to get prints done at labs and then > encouraged them to do so. He would then turn around and sue the labs > for copyright violations. Pretty low, if really true. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Monday, October 6, 2008, 2:25:04 PM, you wrote: > > DJB> Hum, would not have thought about that. > > DJB> FWIW i have never been asked, so take that as you may. > > DJB> <g> > > DJB> Dave > > DJB> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Bruce Dayton > DJB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> No, the issue for labs is that if they reproduce something that is >>> copyrighted they are on the hook for it. If a customer came in with >>> copyrighted material and said it wasn't, the lab is still liable if >>> they reproduce it. So they either need a sworn statement from the >>> photographer on company letterhead authorizing the customer to make >>> copies (prints) or the customer has to sign a statement indicated >>> that he is the original owner/creator of the image(s). >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Bruce >>> >>> >>> Monday, October 6, 2008, 2:16:44 PM, you wrote: >>> >>> DJB> Lovely smile and eyes. >>> >>> DJB> Would they be concerned that the files were being ripped off maybe,.?? >>> >>> DJB> Dave >>> >>> DJB> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Bruce Dayton >>> DJB> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >From a recent set of portraits I took of my daughter, my wife wanted >>>>> some small, cheap prints done. This is a job for Walmart. So I went >>>>> in and put the digital order in. When my wife went to pick them up, >>>>> they wouldn't release them because they looked 'too professional'. >>>>> In a way, it was pleasing to hear that the operators there thought >>>>> the shot was good. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the image that was printed: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 135mm, Fill Flash >>>>> ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/4.5, Handheld >>>>> >>>>> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_6170b.htm >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Bruce >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>>> follow the directions. >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
