Dario Bonazza wrote:
William Robb wrote:
For weddings and portraits, I would like something closer to 24x36
(enough smaller that some sort of shake reduction can be had in body
with 35mm format coverage lenses, perhaps 20x30mm), and 12-14 MP.
This should give enough of an increase in pixel size to give better
noise control than what we are seeing now, and enough pixels to allow
large enough wall prints to be made.
I really think it is important for Pentax to keep in body SR, as that
is realy the only thing that sets their cameras apart from the herd.
I'm not interested in building a fourth lens system, so any 645 mount
DLSR is of zero interest to me, no matter how many megapixies they put
into it.
Strange things happen: I agree with Bill.
Don't worry folks, I got it ;-)
I agree, too, BTW. It would be foolish for Pentax go try to make a
full-on pro system camera like the 1D or the D3, but they do need
something like a D700, A900 or D5. I expect we'll get it, though not for
a while.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
