He does say "As a result, the new G! occupies 29 cubic inches , in contrast to the 64 cubic inches for the Nikon (D90); it weighs 8 oz vs. 22." He also says it's bigger and heavier than the Olympus 420. The 420 weighs 13.4 oz (so I suspect he meant to write 18 oz. for the G1) and is 38.6 cubic inches, assuming he just multiplied out the dimensions (5.1x3.6x2.1). So I'm confused as well.
>>> Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/23/2008 2:51 PM >>> On Oct 23, 2008, at 13:43, Steve Desjardins wrote: > His most serious > reason for not buying the camera is that next year's model will have > video capabilities. ...and that it's heavier and not really any smaller than the smallest DSLR (Olympus 420). Or did I read that incorrectly? -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. !SIG:4900cf57306521005970475! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
