Yep. I also saw this article. In fact I've just finished reading
(diagonally) through it.
Although I am not immediately in agreement with published findings and
although I haven't seen the prints and although I don't intend to
download these files and pixel peep into them, I generally approve of
Michael Reichmann's conclusion. The Moore's law is kicking in with the
vengeance.
Also indeed it may be that new Digic IV processor is a serious step
up/forward for Canon.
On the other hand, one can notice in the article that print-wise the
difference between 15 MP G10 and that MF camera wasn't all that apparent
up until and including 13x19 prints. Given that A3 is how many - 11x16
inches or so, it also means that even ancient from Moore's perspective
K10D is still pretty much up to the task.
It only makes me wonder what will it be in 10 years from now.
Boris
Subash wrote:
got it from reading another forum actually but thought it worth
posting it here:The MF Hasselblad H2 with Phase One P45+ back compared
to a Canon G10....on 13x19 prints...(i guess i am relatively workless
at work today :-))
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml
quoting without prejudice:
"The point of all of this is simple. As the industry matures the low
end is improving rapidly while the high end's improvements are slowing
down. This is narrowing the gap, and that's good news for all of us.
Don't read too much more into it than that."
regards, subash
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
