On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:38:33 -0600, "Charles Robinson" <charl...@visi.com> said:
> I must say that from all of that writing, I sure expected the > difference between the two images to be much more radical. I can > barely tell the difference! They are both quite vivid. > > Maybe my eye just suck. :-) Yes - it's a very colourful piece of equipment. I'm hoping that they eventually restore it to working order. In Photoshop, turning the 'Paint with Light' layers on and off seems to give a greater difference in colour intensity than when comparing the two images side by side. If your eyes suck, so do mine! Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > On Feb 1, 2009, at 5:08, Brian Walters wrote: > > Confession time! I was treating this as an abstract and did nudge the > > brightness more that I would normally do using a Photoshop action > > called > > "Paint with Light". It basically adds a Colour Burn" layer and a > > "Colour Dodge" layer to the image and you can adjust the depth and > > intensity of the colour by painting on the layers with low opacity > > black > > and white, respectively. I find it a nice action to have handy but it > > can be easily overdone! > > > > Anyway, here's the image without the 'Paint with Light" layers. > > > > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/IMGP8998peso1.jpg > > > > and here's the original PESO: > > > > http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/118084/Pistons_and_Gears.html > > -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
