Godfrey,
For god's sake read the quoted text man!
Charles said (below)
"I'd love to have this lens. I'll wager it costs almost as much as the 16-50
zoom though, which will put it out of the "reasonable" range for me.
If they could sell it for $250 or less, I'd be RIGHT THERE. I'll wager it
goes for $500-600 easily, though. :-("
So I offered the M20/4 as a compact version which might be available
for $250 or less.
I know what a 15mm field of view is although I rarely use it. (so big and heavy)
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <godd...@mac.com> wrote:
> ?? To whom are you directing this question? Besides which, a 15mm lens has a
> very different FoV compared to a 20mm lens.
>
> G
>
> On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>> So why not buy an old M-20mm f4 lens.
>> It is more compact than the new 15mm f4.
>> Regards, Bob S.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Charles Robinson <charl...@visi.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2009, at 20:58, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I tend to use ultrawide lenses stopped down anyway ... I usually used
>>>> the
>>>> DA14 at f/5-f/8. So if this lens is good at f/4, it will be delightful.
>>>>
>>>> G
>>>>
>>>
>>> .. especially since you don't need to use it on a specifically-Pentax
>>> camera, right?
>>>
>>> I'd love to have this lens. I'll wager it costs almost as much as the
>>> 16-50
>>> zoom though, which will put it out of the "reasonable" range for me.
>>>
>>> If they could sell it for $250 or less, I'd be RIGHT THERE. I'll wager
>>> it
>>> goes for $500-600 easily, though. :-(
>>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
