2009/2/26 Adam Maas <a...@mawz.ca>: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Amirkambiz Hamedanizadeh > <amirkam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Pentaxian, >> Thank you for kind comments. As far I understand, Pentax SMC-FA 50mm f/1.4 >> is more favorable. >> My wife increased my budget to 300 US$, so I wonder if it is worth to choose >> Pentax smc P-FA 35mm F2.0 instead of Pentax SMC-FA 50mm f/1.4, as it has >> better review in photozone? >> >> In general I do not take lots of portrait pictures, but I would like to >> start, in addition to that, sometimes need to take pictures in the night. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Amirkambiz >> > > The 50's the better low-light lens. But the 35's a great lens and a > 'normal' perspective. That said, I never much liked 35 on digital, > preferring the longer 40 or the shorter 28 as normals.
I love the 35mm FL on FF. It's my standard lens on the D700 when I want to travel "light" (relative term) Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
